Appellate Law Center
Our appellate lawyers provide the latest updates on the appeals courts. This blog is maintained by the Litigation Department of Stevens & Lee.
Whether qui tam survives will have very tangible consequences for the government, those who do business with the government, and the bar.
New Jersey’s public bidding laws are designed to promote fair, transparent and competitive contract awards based on objective criteria and documented evaluations that ensure the best value for taxpayers.
Chatrie begins to provide answers on whether and how the Fourth Amendment applies to data.
Thomson Reuters v. ROSS Intelligence will be one of the most consequential copyright opinions of the AI era.
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania is poised to decide a narrow question with far‑reaching consequences for public utility regulation.
In a precedential decision, a panel of three judges reprimanded and sharply criticized a lawyer for failing to check the accuracy of what turned out to be AI hallucinations in his appellate brief.
The Third Circuit’s holding in Massey realigns New Jersey law with federal judicial precedents in the reverse discrimination context.
In Massey v. Borough of Bergenfield, the legality of the current, employer-friendly “background circumstances” test applied to reverse discrimination cases in NJ will be decided.
The Wentworth opinion is a good example of an appellate court’s justification in offering salutary expressions not necessary to decide the case or having the force of law.
Subscribe for Blog Updates