Appellate Law Center
Our appellate lawyers provide the latest updates on the appeals courts. This blog is maintained by the Litigation Department of Stevens & Lee.
The resulting appellate opinion will serve as an important case for future bidding challenges, emphasizing that New Jersey’s competitive-bidding process is not left to the discretion of public entities.
As a result of the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision to overrule “Chevron Deference,” it is anticipated that state courts will reconsider their own doctrines and deferential standards of review.
If your company offers a product that is equivalent to or better than the product solicited by a NJ public entity, but your product does not fall exactly within the characteristics described in the specifications, challenging the specification before a bid may pro
Numerous public bid protests have been successful either when presented to the bidding entity itself or after review by the courts, and an aggrieved bidder should not think that their plight is unwinnable.
Considering that Orphans’ Court matters cover trust litigation with large sums of money at stake, misunderstanding the rules of this unusual court can implicate huge consequences.
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania issued its long-awaited tax-exempt bond financing decision, Ursinus College v. Prevailing Wage Appeals Board.
This opinion will serve as an important case for future third-party challenges to M/WBE Certifications, particularly in emerging industries.
Most appellate courts allow reconsideration and reargument requests, but that does not mean they should be filed.
These programs provide a way for parties to settle while on appeal, and often are free.
Subscribe for Blog Updates